No? Then Google it… you might learn something cool. So, you
might be asking yourself what does this have to do with
shredding the gnar? Sometimes we hear people say "there
ought to be a law"... well, there usually already is it
simply take courage and common semnse to apply them in a
modern era. Stay with me… it is going to make both dollars
and sense at the end if you get it.
Back
in the day names like Rockefeller, Carnegie and more where
synonymous with wealth, power and influence. Some claimed
they held monopolies in the oil and steel industries at the
time and that monopolies where bad for the country and the
economy. Families like the Rockefeller's, Carnegie's and
others were thought to be the most intelligent men of their
time because the companies they created and the wealth they
amassed. These smart men hired the best attorneys, fought
tooth and nail and argued breaking up their monopolies would
destroy what they had built and earned. The courts found
these enterprises to be monopolies in restraint of trade and
ordered them broken up in spite of their best efforts.
Turns out the richest men of the times were not as smart as
everyone thought. The Sherman Anti-Trust Act broke up their
monopolies, but providing them with a stake in a multitude
of new enterprises and opportunities that resulted. Instead
of owning one oil or steel company they owned a stake in
almost all of them.. then they capitalized again from new
opportunities as they emerged like the railroads,
automobiles and more. The empires and names these men had
created and fought to preserve ultimately became wealthier
and more influential than they ever imagined as a result.
In addition to building empires and extraordinary
wealth free market competition facilitated opportunities for
new ventures and enterprises that were creating good paying
jobs and elevating the standard of living for working
people. Elevating the standard of living resulted in
increased consumer spending creating greater demand and more
opportunities for new businesses and entrepreneurs. At the
same time the growing market resulted in more choices,
better goods and services at more competitive prices for
consumers
.
Today's big resort
conglomerates are focused on business models and profits not
people and opportunities. Heartless corporations are run by
the same type of profit driven individuals who fear losing
what they have just like Rockefeller and Carnegie before
them. Big corporate resorts want consumers to spend as much
of every dollar at one of their enterprises. That means they
want you to travel on the transportation they operate, stay
at the hotel they own, eat at their restaurants, shop at
their stores, rent gear from their shops.
When the BIG resort corporation owns most of the hotels,
restaurants, shops, etc this is a modern approach to
building resort market monopolies. Don't be fooled into
believing the name or brand appearing on the hotel,
restaurant or store as it is probably a franchise operated
by the resort company. Unfortunately, the adverse side
effects of this modern monopoly can be seen and felt by
residents and visitors in mountain resort communities as
prices continue to increase as options, opportunities and
wages shrink impacting the caliber of work force, employee
retention, quality of service and more.
Instead
of harnessing the passion that made mountain towns great and
collaborating with local business these BIG resorts forget
their roots as a local business that counted on the support
of locals and opted to monopolize as much of the market
place as they can, forcing out the very families and
businesses how played a role in their success. Corporate
resorts are more about non-compete agreements, local
politics, code enforcement, etc in efforts to restrain and
eliminate competition. This means a lower standards of
service and higher prices… and if you don't like it go to a
different store… but almost all of the stores are all owned
by the resort. They don't have to care or even try get your
money, so they pay the lowest wages to part-time seasonal
employees who will be gone before the season ends. The
corporate resort approach is to charge as much as possible
and spend as little as possible… this maybe good for profits
but bad for guest experiences and word of mouth advertising.
These strategies reflect their profits over people
philosophy and approach regardless of the money spent on PR
spin and media campaigns.
If the heads
of BIG resort corporate resorts were true leaders they would
recognize an opportunity to apply lesson from the past in a
modern way to grow their profits and strengthen the
communities they claim to care so much about. Partnering
with people and the community will elevate the caliber of
goods and services, reduce employee turn over and diversify
their customer and community base from Baby Boomers to
Millennials. But, if you're able or unwilling to learn from
history you have already exposed your belief in an corporate
greed and oppression models is still built is built on
people, passion and powder days!
As they
say those who fail to learn from history are destined to
repeat it